Seed-stage SaaS pivoting from B2C to B2B

Guided a high-risk pivot and partial migration; pruning, B2B hub pages, and technical hygiene turned the post-launch trough into a ~3× recovery and set up sustained growth.

Traffic Increase
+ 0 %
Keywords Ranking
+ 0 K
Founded
0
Funding
$ 0 M
Employees
+ 0
ARR
+$ 0 M
Users
+ 0 K
Valuation
~$ 0 M

TL;DR

During a complex rebrand and audience shift (B2C → B2B), we protected core organic equity, intentionally retired misaligned B2C rankings, and rebuilt visibility for the new product focus.

Within the engagement (Mar-2018 → Sep-2020) traffic fell to an expected trough, then recovered ≈3× by the end.

After hand-off, the same strategy base scaled further: traffic peaked at ≈500k/month in late-2021 and the tracked keyword set rose from ≈1.4k at the trough → ≈22k by Sep-2020 → ≈180k by early-2022.

Context & goals

  • Company: Creative/video tools pivoting from broad B2C free tools to a freemium B2B product.

  • Engagement: Mar 2018 → Sep 2020.

  • Primary objectives:

    1. Minimize “value at risk” during rebrand + partial migration.

    2. Rebuild visibility around B2B topics and product pages.

    3. Establish a clean technical baseline for scale.

Challenges

  • Audience and intent shift: large volumes of legacy B2C URLs with rankings we no longer wanted.

  • Partial migration (not a simple 1:1 domain swap): mix of 301s, 410s and canonicals.

  • Equity triage: decide what to keep, what to consolidate, what to retire.

  • Proving “good loss” vs harmful loss required clear measurement.

What I did (high-impact interventions)

  • Redirect & retirement plan — page-level “keep/redirect/retire” matrix; 301s for high-equity, B2B-relevant assets; 410/noindex for misaligned B2C pages.

  • B2B content rebuild — topic map and briefs for use-cases, templates, integrations; hub pages to focus internal links and link equity.

  • Technical cleanup — canonical and sitemap hygiene; internal-link rewiring from legacy posts to new hubs; structured data on product and hub pages.

  • Recovery playbook & monitoring — monthly tracking of traffic and keyword buckets; iterative redirect fixes guided by crawl and rank movements.

  • Value-at-stake governance — priority set by risk and business impact so engineering time went where it mattered.

Deliverables

  • Redirect/retirement matrix with implementation notes.

  • B2B topic map, briefs, and hub/landing templates.

  • Canonical/sitemap/internal-linking checklists.

  • Monthly recovery dashboard (traffic + keyword buckets).

  • Post-launch QA and correction backlog.

Results

Traffic trend

  • Start of work (early-2018): ~28k/month.

  • Trough (Feb-2019): ~9k/month.

  • End of engagement (Sep-2020): ~25k/month — ≈3× vs trough.

  • Post-engagement peak (late-2021): ~500k/month (sustained into 2022 before normalisation).

  • 2023–2025 stabilised in the ~150–300k/month band for long stretches, with known market and product-mix fluctuations later in 2025.

Keyword visibility

Pre-pivot reference (Feb-2018)

  • Total: ~195k

  • #1–3: ~6.2k | 4–10: ~4.7k | 11–20: ~14k | 21–50: ~67k | 51+: ~102k

Trough (Feb-2019)

  • Total: ~1.4k

  • #1–3: ~0.18k | 4–10: ~0.30k | 11–20: ~0.10k | 21–50: ~0.16k | 51+: ~0.9k

End of engagement (Sep-2020)

  • Total: ~22k (~15× vs trough)

  • #1–3: ~1.0k (~5× vs trough) | 4–10: ~0.28k | 11–20: ~1.4k | 21–50: ~4.7k | 51+: ~15k

Post-engagement expansion (early-2022 peak)

  • Total: ~180k (≈8× vs Sep-2020; ≈130× vs trough)

  • #1–3: ~7k+ (≈7× vs Sep-2020; ≈40× vs trough)

Interpretation

  • The contraction around the pivot was planned: we retired B2C rankings that no longer matched the buyer.

  • By Sep-2020, the site had a rebuilt base of head-term (#1–3) and broad coverage aligned to B2B.

  • After hand-off, that base supported rapid scale to ~500k/month traffic and a ~180k keyword footprint, then settled into a durable range.

Why it worked

  • Intent-first decisions. We preserved and redirected only what served the new buyer; everything else was cleanly retired.

  • Systematic technical execution. Canonicals, sitemaps and internal links concentrated crawl on the right assets.

  • Tight feedback loop. Monthly bucket tracking and crawl diagnostics guided continuous fixes.

  • Risk framing. The “value at stake” lens kept the migration from over-engineering and focused effort on revenue-relevant pages.

Get in touch

If you are looking for someone to help with your organic growth your just someone to bounce some ideas, send me a message.